Skip to main content

Letting go to grow


Growth creates one of the most difficult mindset issues in a leader. The ability to grow most likely means a leader has to get out of her current job and give it to someone else or else incur the risk of hindering growth - for herself or her company. Examples are abundant. The head of product that becomes head of business. The start up founder that makes her first hire (even if it is a VA!). The CEO who steps up to Chairman and hands someone else the reins. The visionary charity founder who can no longer do everything.

No matter what the industry is, the size of company or stage of the company - letting go is hard. Understandably, letting know creates an admittance that there is someone out there that can do what you do. Will you be replaceable then? Letting go means you will not make every single decision. Will people second guess your previous decisions then? Letting go means you will not be in all the nitty gritty details of running the company or business. What if you miss an important detail then? The list could go on as the uncertainty about the future and insecurities about one’s worth come to life.

I have personally been through constant processes of letting go in my corporate and charity career. And I am not talking delegation. Delegation can be done through a process of going through project or task lists and assigning them to team members. That is certainly important too and I can probably write multiple blogs about that. However you retain ultimate control and there is often an embedded assumption that there will be some checking and reporting back along the way. But that is not the hardest thing, as hard as it actually may be.

Over the last months, I have been through a renewed process of delegation with my team, ensuring team members exposure, level of interests and ambitions were met, alongside team meetings and 1on1 checks. I delegated execution but at any point I am able to jump back into most of the tasks at hand. I call that protecting coverage, but really, it is a limited ability of letting go. And with that in mind, this last effort I have been through has been stronger than ever before, and I did finally let go of some things, and will only go back in if requested, not on my own terms necessarily. Why? Growth.

Only by letting go do you allow yourself space for growth. If you are delegating but not really putting it out of your headspace, it is hard to grow. It is hard to grow into a new role, it is hard to grow the company, it  is hard to scale impact. Because I had the ambition to spend more time on a new role I was assigned, I knew the only option would be to have the actual free time and calendar to do it. In the first few days where I actually properly let go of many projects, it felt weird. The calendar was less full and everyone around me was looking busy. What now? And then growth happened, I started working my way into what I needed to achieve in my new role, what the needs are, the strategy, the plan. I lived up to my lead title by actually being a thought leader, not just executing on what my old role included in the hope to one day have time for the new role.
That first moment of void is hard. But I am getting to grips with it. 

I have also been on the other side of the spectrum, trying to help business leaders let go. Not always to me, but let go of certain project or roles. And the first reaction was not always the most positive. Knowing I was threading difficult waters, I recently brought up the growth ambition. ‘You will never be what this job needs you to be unless you let go’. And then suddenly you start to see the spark and the possibilities. It is only when you stop having a job that you really are able to mentally conceptualize a new one.

I have spent the last 10 years letting go in my charity. I don’t have to know all the children’s names, you don’t have to know all the numbers; you don’t have to respond to all the emails, you don't have to know every single new owner, you don’t have to make all the small decisions. I chose not to every day. And we have grown beyond myself. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The trouble with data

I a bit of a data freak. I like my data, preferably correct. I feel like James Bond as he approaches the bar. How do you like your data? "Accurate, not Cut". That would be me. I don't take it re-worked, re-cut or in extracts. I take it raw so I know what it is, what it means, what it tells me, what flaws it has. The problem with data is that people more often than not do not understand what they are looking at. You asked for a piece of analysis and someone sends you a chart and you take it as it is. You believe you have done the right question and the person has interpreted what you were after the write way, extracted what you intended. A whole bunch of assumptions which my time working inside an organization (other than in the client facing side of the business) has taught me are mostly flawed. When we start looking at a problem, most likely we don't really know what we are after. We feel that there is some data that illustrates our story but really

Due Diligence: The Art of 100 Questions (to start with...)

It is one of those stories that the old days come back to haunt you. I started my career as a Banker and am no stranger to due diligence lists. I have been both on the receiving end and in the creative end of those. I have created data rooms to respond, massive excel spreadsheets, and have trolled through data rooms to find more information. I have mention this before, I am always data hungry. For those paying attention you might ask - but aren't you done with your banking years and off due diligence lists? Well, not really. First, I was never entirely out of due diligence. In fact, I apply due diligence as a modus operandi for challenging the status quo. I just start looking at the numbers, and then ask question #1, which inevitably leads to #2 and is inevitably linked to #3. It does not take a form of an excel spreadsheet and I don't get answers back via data rooms, but the concept is constant - a truly inquisitive nature with the purpose of understand and evalua

Strategy Making with a Fact Based Approach without Facts

One of my first tasks as I came back from maternity leave was to conduct a strategic review of one of our businesses, one where we have consistently under-performed.  The premise is simple, we should have everything to succeed in this business, what is wrong then! We stopped buying that the market was slow a long time ago, as competitors deals kept being thrown in or face. We knew we had a structural problem but when we asked the team for a business plan, we got a pipeline back. Given I was reading the #leanstartup while doing this, I decided to apply a fact based approach, whereby I started from basic assumptions to question the team. After a first round focused only on market size and product details, the claim continued to be lack of transparency on the numbers. The discussion jump started to a business mix debate, as it became enlightening that people had very opposed views about why we should be pursuing different parts of the business. Diagnostic 1: no-one agrees with each