Skip to main content

Where is the credit to the strategy?

Today I break my original plan to do a series on performance metrics as a topic has been lingering on my mind for a few days. Or shall I say a frustration instead. 

It is clear by now I am a believer in business planning for established businesses, but mostly I am a believer in establishing goals, a direction and a way to measure progress on them, in order to evaluate late surprises. My view is not necessarily a shared view. In many places, business planning is a tick the box exercise that people need to deal with because management says so. And they go through it as fast and disconnected as they can. 

As a new business planning cycle begins, I can feel the angst already. The rolling of the eyes as a new template goes out and the inevitable question of ‘why do we need all this’. There were moments in the past where I thought I was not really a strategist but rather a document producing machine. I too faced my own set planning cycles and wondered, I too challenged the need to plan if we know what we are doing. However, recent years have showed me the benefit of discipline but more than that, of the thought process behind it. Who cares about what you put on paper - I really just want you to be thinking. And it is that thought that makes a difference to the business. The CEO or head of business moment. That is worth all the rolling of the eyes I get. 

I have seen multiple leaders getting increasingly organised about strategy, metrics and structured thought climbing through the ladders. The thinking ahead has the benefit that the drive to make it happen in the middle of multiple demands is more focused. But it also ensures that you are able to communicate - and with communication comes better coordination and, inevitably, execution.

This turned out into another monologue about business plans, which was not the intention. In fact, my biggest frustration is the lack of credit people give it. I am not talking about my own personal or career credit, though we could have another whole monologue on it. Indeed I am frustrated by how much people don’t credit improvements to the fact they actually have a plan. Most times we did great with a client relationship or we positioned the books well, there is nothing to do with planning. And even though I recognise most value in the day to day people in the business, that is rarely sustainable value. The nature of growth we are aiming at expects much more than the day to day. And without giving credit to the challenge,  I don’t often see people reaching their right potential. Which frustrates me. 

Credit to being strategic does not mean you are not amazing at your day job, just means you raise above it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Strategy Making with a Fact Based Approach without Facts

One of my first tasks as I came back from maternity leave was to conduct a strategic review of one of our businesses, one where we have consistently under-performed.  The premise is simple, we should have everything to succeed in this business, what is wrong then! We stopped buying that the market was slow a long time ago, as competitors deals kept being thrown in or face. We knew we had a structural problem but when we asked the team for a business plan, we got a pipeline back. Given I was reading the #leanstartup while doing this, I decided to apply a fact based approach, whereby I started from basic assumptions to question the team. After a first round focused only on market size and product details, the claim continued to be lack of transparency on the numbers. The discussion jump started to a business mix debate, as it became enlightening that people had very opposed views about why we should be pursuing different parts of the business. Diagnostic 1: no-one agrees with each

The trouble with data

I a bit of a data freak. I like my data, preferably correct. I feel like James Bond as he approaches the bar. How do you like your data? "Accurate, not Cut". That would be me. I don't take it re-worked, re-cut or in extracts. I take it raw so I know what it is, what it means, what it tells me, what flaws it has. The problem with data is that people more often than not do not understand what they are looking at. You asked for a piece of analysis and someone sends you a chart and you take it as it is. You believe you have done the right question and the person has interpreted what you were after the write way, extracted what you intended. A whole bunch of assumptions which my time working inside an organization (other than in the client facing side of the business) has taught me are mostly flawed. When we start looking at a problem, most likely we don't really know what we are after. We feel that there is some data that illustrates our story but really

Due Diligence: The Art of 100 Questions (to start with...)

It is one of those stories that the old days come back to haunt you. I started my career as a Banker and am no stranger to due diligence lists. I have been both on the receiving end and in the creative end of those. I have created data rooms to respond, massive excel spreadsheets, and have trolled through data rooms to find more information. I have mention this before, I am always data hungry. For those paying attention you might ask - but aren't you done with your banking years and off due diligence lists? Well, not really. First, I was never entirely out of due diligence. In fact, I apply due diligence as a modus operandi for challenging the status quo. I just start looking at the numbers, and then ask question #1, which inevitably leads to #2 and is inevitably linked to #3. It does not take a form of an excel spreadsheet and I don't get answers back via data rooms, but the concept is constant - a truly inquisitive nature with the purpose of understand and evalua