Skip to main content

Where is the credit to the strategy?

Today I break my original plan to do a series on performance metrics as a topic has been lingering on my mind for a few days. Or shall I say a frustration instead. 

It is clear by now I am a believer in business planning for established businesses, but mostly I am a believer in establishing goals, a direction and a way to measure progress on them, in order to evaluate late surprises. My view is not necessarily a shared view. In many places, business planning is a tick the box exercise that people need to deal with because management says so. And they go through it as fast and disconnected as they can. 

As a new business planning cycle begins, I can feel the angst already. The rolling of the eyes as a new template goes out and the inevitable question of ‘why do we need all this’. There were moments in the past where I thought I was not really a strategist but rather a document producing machine. I too faced my own set planning cycles and wondered, I too challenged the need to plan if we know what we are doing. However, recent years have showed me the benefit of discipline but more than that, of the thought process behind it. Who cares about what you put on paper - I really just want you to be thinking. And it is that thought that makes a difference to the business. The CEO or head of business moment. That is worth all the rolling of the eyes I get. 

I have seen multiple leaders getting increasingly organised about strategy, metrics and structured thought climbing through the ladders. The thinking ahead has the benefit that the drive to make it happen in the middle of multiple demands is more focused. But it also ensures that you are able to communicate - and with communication comes better coordination and, inevitably, execution.

This turned out into another monologue about business plans, which was not the intention. In fact, my biggest frustration is the lack of credit people give it. I am not talking about my own personal or career credit, though we could have another whole monologue on it. Indeed I am frustrated by how much people don’t credit improvements to the fact they actually have a plan. Most times we did great with a client relationship or we positioned the books well, there is nothing to do with planning. And even though I recognise most value in the day to day people in the business, that is rarely sustainable value. The nature of growth we are aiming at expects much more than the day to day. And without giving credit to the challenge,  I don’t often see people reaching their right potential. Which frustrates me. 

Credit to being strategic does not mean you are not amazing at your day job, just means you raise above it. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Strategy Making with a Fact Based Approach without Facts

One of my first tasks as I came back from maternity leave was to conduct a strategic review of one of our businesses, one where we have consistently under-performed.  The premise is simple, we should have everything to succeed in this business, what is wrong then! We stopped buying that the market was slow a long time ago, as competitors deals kept being thrown in or face. We knew we had a structural problem but when we asked the team for a business plan, we got a pipeline back. Given I was reading the #leanstartup while doing this, I decided to apply a fact based approach, whereby I started from basic assumptions to question the team. After a first round focused only on market size and product details, the claim continued to be lack of transparency on the numbers. The discussion jump started to a business mix debate, as it became enlightening that people had very opposed views about why we should be pursuing different parts of the business. Diagnostic 1: no-one agrees with ...

The time of year for Performance Reviews - Dos and Don’ts

I am worried to open my browser on the evaluations website, to find out how many reviews I need to fill in. I have blocked out Friday for this, while I work from home, but we all know how planning days free of ‘work’ often works. Everywhere around me I see people going through the official adjectives list, googling some of them, figuring out what the best term is to define someone who does really well 90pct of the way but then is never able to finish. I appreciate the commitment to do it, but inevitably we all complain.  Very timely, I put myself on a management course on providing feedback and supporting career development this week. Although more focused on the actual discussion, for me it was important to go over a few techniques and I am certain it will set us all in the mindset to write better reviews.  What is a valuable review?  It has clear feedback - no dancing around the issue or vague compliments. How? ‘You did a great job well done!’ vs ‘You...

My day job as a Manager and Strategist

I am one of those 'non producers' that, per the name used, brings no production to the place I work for - read it no client or trading revenues. I am also called 'management' in a good day, central overhead in a bad day. With this start, why am I even talking about it? I moved into the management side, from a promising career in Investment Banking, 6.5 years ago. What originally started as an experiment because I was bored and wanted to grow, quickly became a career per se . I was astonished at the massive differential between the people producing in the business and those managing it (eg not producing). I knew then that my ability to make an impact for the Firm was beyond revenue generation and my IBD discipline and HBS critical approach were just what I needed.  Managing a business has clients and revenues at its core. But everything else around it determines its long term sustainability. The businesses that spend enough time governing themselves, measuring themselve...